Review



mouse anti cd104  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems mouse anti cd104
    Mouse Anti Cd104, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 10 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pm41735293-593-25-27?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 10 article reviews
    mouse anti cd104 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    R&D Systems mouse anti cd104
    Mouse Anti Cd104, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pm41735293-593-25-27?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti cd104 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech rabbit anti mouse itgb1
    Rabbit Anti Mouse Itgb1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pm41712464-33-51-60?v=Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti mouse itgb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems goat anti integrin β1
    Goat Anti Integrin β1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pm41680210-264-15-18?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    goat anti integrin β1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals mouse anti human β1 integrin antibodies
    a Single- and multi-channel micrographs (maximum intensity projections) of migrating cells. ROIs: 1) leading edge protrusion, 2) membrane bleb, 3) retraction fiber and 4) collagen contact-free membrane. White arrow, migration direction. Scale bar, 5 µm. b Zoom of leading pseudopod from ( a ). White arrowheads and insets (A, B), <t>β1</t> clusters outward-segregated from glycocalyx. Scale bar, 2 µm. c Size of 499 β1 clusters from 22 leading edge protrusions (7 cells, 3 independent experiments). d Representative micrographs (from inset A, panel b) of β1-glycocalyx segregation. White arrowhead and line denote β1 cluster and ROI used for outer cluster analysis. Blue line/arrowhead, lateral ROI/boundaries for β1 cluster-adjacent inner zone. Yellow arrowheads, β1 cluster-associated collagen fibers. Collagen channel, Fire pseudocolor. Asterisk, intersection point of both line ROIs. Scale bar, 1 µm. o, outer cluster; i, inner cluster. e Quantification of β1-glycocalyx distance segregation in individual contact to collagen fibril. Magenta/yellow dashed lines, cluster /glycocalyx enrichment middle, determined by maximum β1/glycocalyx levels for outer clusters and corresponding peak in the lateral ROI (inner zone). Blue box, β1 cluster edges, based on the peak-adjacent lateral minima. f , g paired β1 ( f ) and glycocalyx ( g ) enrichment in outer β1 cluster and corresponding lateral membrane zone, normalized to matched membrane region lacking β1 clustering (“nonfocal”). 25 (cell body) and 38 (inner-outer matched) line ROIs from 9 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test with Bonferroni correction (ε 2 = 0.25 ( f ) and ε 2 = 0.54 ( g ), large effect size). h Segregation distance of β1 and glycocalyx in outer β1 clusters. Data show 25 individual perpendicular membrane regions and 38 focal outward clusters from 11 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (ε 2 = 0.56, large effect size). i Correlation of local glycocalyx density and β1 enrichment in outward β1 clusters (R-squared = −0.02, adjusted p -value = 1). Data replotted from ( h ). Line, logarithmic fitting curve with 95% confidence interval (ribbon). All data derive from the same 3 independent experiments. Cells (all panels): MV3. Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. ROI region of interest. β1, β1 <t>integrin.</t> Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Mouse Anti Human β1 Integrin Antibodies, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pmc13004896-294-41-48?v=Novus+Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti human β1 integrin antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems mouse anti human integrin beta 7 itgb7 antibody
    a Single- and multi-channel micrographs (maximum intensity projections) of migrating cells. ROIs: 1) leading edge protrusion, 2) membrane bleb, 3) retraction fiber and 4) collagen contact-free membrane. White arrow, migration direction. Scale bar, 5 µm. b Zoom of leading pseudopod from ( a ). White arrowheads and insets (A, B), <t>β1</t> clusters outward-segregated from glycocalyx. Scale bar, 2 µm. c Size of 499 β1 clusters from 22 leading edge protrusions (7 cells, 3 independent experiments). d Representative micrographs (from inset A, panel b) of β1-glycocalyx segregation. White arrowhead and line denote β1 cluster and ROI used for outer cluster analysis. Blue line/arrowhead, lateral ROI/boundaries for β1 cluster-adjacent inner zone. Yellow arrowheads, β1 cluster-associated collagen fibers. Collagen channel, Fire pseudocolor. Asterisk, intersection point of both line ROIs. Scale bar, 1 µm. o, outer cluster; i, inner cluster. e Quantification of β1-glycocalyx distance segregation in individual contact to collagen fibril. Magenta/yellow dashed lines, cluster /glycocalyx enrichment middle, determined by maximum β1/glycocalyx levels for outer clusters and corresponding peak in the lateral ROI (inner zone). Blue box, β1 cluster edges, based on the peak-adjacent lateral minima. f , g paired β1 ( f ) and glycocalyx ( g ) enrichment in outer β1 cluster and corresponding lateral membrane zone, normalized to matched membrane region lacking β1 clustering (“nonfocal”). 25 (cell body) and 38 (inner-outer matched) line ROIs from 9 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test with Bonferroni correction (ε 2 = 0.25 ( f ) and ε 2 = 0.54 ( g ), large effect size). h Segregation distance of β1 and glycocalyx in outer β1 clusters. Data show 25 individual perpendicular membrane regions and 38 focal outward clusters from 11 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (ε 2 = 0.56, large effect size). i Correlation of local glycocalyx density and β1 enrichment in outward β1 clusters (R-squared = −0.02, adjusted p -value = 1). Data replotted from ( h ). Line, logarithmic fitting curve with 95% confidence interval (ribbon). All data derive from the same 3 independent experiments. Cells (all panels): MV3. Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. ROI region of interest. β1, β1 <t>integrin.</t> Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Mouse Anti Human Integrin Beta 7 Itgb7 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pm41469420-217-0-12?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti human integrin beta 7 itgb7 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems mouse
    a Single- and multi-channel micrographs (maximum intensity projections) of migrating cells. ROIs: 1) leading edge protrusion, 2) membrane bleb, 3) retraction fiber and 4) collagen contact-free membrane. White arrow, migration direction. Scale bar, 5 µm. b Zoom of leading pseudopod from ( a ). White arrowheads and insets (A, B), <t>β1</t> clusters outward-segregated from glycocalyx. Scale bar, 2 µm. c Size of 499 β1 clusters from 22 leading edge protrusions (7 cells, 3 independent experiments). d Representative micrographs (from inset A, panel b) of β1-glycocalyx segregation. White arrowhead and line denote β1 cluster and ROI used for outer cluster analysis. Blue line/arrowhead, lateral ROI/boundaries for β1 cluster-adjacent inner zone. Yellow arrowheads, β1 cluster-associated collagen fibers. Collagen channel, Fire pseudocolor. Asterisk, intersection point of both line ROIs. Scale bar, 1 µm. o, outer cluster; i, inner cluster. e Quantification of β1-glycocalyx distance segregation in individual contact to collagen fibril. Magenta/yellow dashed lines, cluster /glycocalyx enrichment middle, determined by maximum β1/glycocalyx levels for outer clusters and corresponding peak in the lateral ROI (inner zone). Blue box, β1 cluster edges, based on the peak-adjacent lateral minima. f , g paired β1 ( f ) and glycocalyx ( g ) enrichment in outer β1 cluster and corresponding lateral membrane zone, normalized to matched membrane region lacking β1 clustering (“nonfocal”). 25 (cell body) and 38 (inner-outer matched) line ROIs from 9 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test with Bonferroni correction (ε 2 = 0.25 ( f ) and ε 2 = 0.54 ( g ), large effect size). h Segregation distance of β1 and glycocalyx in outer β1 clusters. Data show 25 individual perpendicular membrane regions and 38 focal outward clusters from 11 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (ε 2 = 0.56, large effect size). i Correlation of local glycocalyx density and β1 enrichment in outward β1 clusters (R-squared = −0.02, adjusted p -value = 1). Data replotted from ( h ). Line, logarithmic fitting curve with 95% confidence interval (ribbon). All data derive from the same 3 independent experiments. Cells (all panels): MV3. Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. ROI region of interest. β1, β1 <t>integrin.</t> Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Mouse, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pmc12789914-76-16-17?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals unconjugated mouse anti human itgb2 ab
    Melanoma cell-intrinsic <t>ITGB2</t> expression and activation by CD44 ( A ) Single-cell (sc) RNA-seq analysis of human ITGB2 gene ( ITGB2 ) expression by patient melanoma (MM) cells versus tumor-infiltrating T cells or endothelial cells (ECs), as depicted by violin plots (median, bold white line; top and bottom quartiles, thin white lines) overlayed with dots representing respective single cells ( B ) Percentages (mean,) of human ITGB2 surface protein expression by patient MM cells, T cells, and ECs ( n = 5 patients) as determined by flow cytometry ( C ) Mean ITGB2 + SOX10 + frequency (%) in benign nevi ( n = 7 patients), primary melanomas ( n = 24 patients), and metastatic melanomas ( n = 13 patients) as determined by multicolor immunofluorescence staining of a patient melanocytic tissue microarray (TMA). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used to assess statistical significance ( D ) Incidence (%) of patient sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases versus respective primary melanoma biospecimen cohorts ( n = 105) of increasing cancer cell-ITGB2 positivity, 0–2% ( n = 40), 2–25% ( n = 36), >25% ( n = 29), as determined by immunostaining. Frequencies of ITGB2-positive (black bars) and ITGB2-negative (white bars) melanoma cells within each cohort are shown. Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine statistical significance ( E ) Representative multiplex immunofluorescence staining of a patient primary melanoma biopsy for co-expression of ITGB2 (red, all panels) and the melanocytic marker, nuclear SOX-10 (green, first panel), pan T cell marker, CD3 (green, second panel), vascular endothelial marker, CD31 (green, third panel), or macrophage marker, PU.1 (green, fourth panel). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Size bars, 50 μm ( F and G ), Representative immunoblots of ITGB2 protein expression by (F) human melanoma lines, A2058, A375, C8161, FEMX, LOX-IMVI, MDA-MB-435S, and control HSB-2 T lymphoblastic leukemia cells and HUVEC endothelial cells, and (G) murine melanoma lines, B16-F10, YUMM1.7, YUMM3.3, YUMM4.1, YUMM5.2, and control EL-4 T cell lymphoma cells and C166 endothelial cells ( H and I ) Effect of CD44 ab-mediated crosslinking (black bars) versus isotype control ab treatment (white bars) on ITGB2 surface protein expression level (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI, ± SEM) by (H) human and (I) murine melanoma lines and respective cell controls (gray bars) as above, based on FC analysis ( J and K ) Effect of CD44 ab crosslinking as in (H and I) on the activation state of human melanoma cell-ITGB2 as determined by FC (MFI ± SEM) using the activation-sensitive ITGB2 antibody clones (J) KIM-127 and (K) MEM-148. Results are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; NS, not significant. See also figs. S1, S2, and S3.
    Unconjugated Mouse Anti Human Itgb2 Ab, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+integrin+beta/pmc12744402-43-11-18?v=Novus+Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    unconjugated mouse anti human itgb2 ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Single- and multi-channel micrographs (maximum intensity projections) of migrating cells. ROIs: 1) leading edge protrusion, 2) membrane bleb, 3) retraction fiber and 4) collagen contact-free membrane. White arrow, migration direction. Scale bar, 5 µm. b Zoom of leading pseudopod from ( a ). White arrowheads and insets (A, B), β1 clusters outward-segregated from glycocalyx. Scale bar, 2 µm. c Size of 499 β1 clusters from 22 leading edge protrusions (7 cells, 3 independent experiments). d Representative micrographs (from inset A, panel b) of β1-glycocalyx segregation. White arrowhead and line denote β1 cluster and ROI used for outer cluster analysis. Blue line/arrowhead, lateral ROI/boundaries for β1 cluster-adjacent inner zone. Yellow arrowheads, β1 cluster-associated collagen fibers. Collagen channel, Fire pseudocolor. Asterisk, intersection point of both line ROIs. Scale bar, 1 µm. o, outer cluster; i, inner cluster. e Quantification of β1-glycocalyx distance segregation in individual contact to collagen fibril. Magenta/yellow dashed lines, cluster /glycocalyx enrichment middle, determined by maximum β1/glycocalyx levels for outer clusters and corresponding peak in the lateral ROI (inner zone). Blue box, β1 cluster edges, based on the peak-adjacent lateral minima. f , g paired β1 ( f ) and glycocalyx ( g ) enrichment in outer β1 cluster and corresponding lateral membrane zone, normalized to matched membrane region lacking β1 clustering (“nonfocal”). 25 (cell body) and 38 (inner-outer matched) line ROIs from 9 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test with Bonferroni correction (ε 2 = 0.25 ( f ) and ε 2 = 0.54 ( g ), large effect size). h Segregation distance of β1 and glycocalyx in outer β1 clusters. Data show 25 individual perpendicular membrane regions and 38 focal outward clusters from 11 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (ε 2 = 0.56, large effect size). i Correlation of local glycocalyx density and β1 enrichment in outward β1 clusters (R-squared = −0.02, adjusted p -value = 1). Data replotted from ( h ). Line, logarithmic fitting curve with 95% confidence interval (ribbon). All data derive from the same 3 independent experiments. Cells (all panels): MV3. Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. ROI region of interest. β1, β1 integrin. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Glycocalyx micro- and nanodomains in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions revealed by enhanced click chemistry

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69242-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Single- and multi-channel micrographs (maximum intensity projections) of migrating cells. ROIs: 1) leading edge protrusion, 2) membrane bleb, 3) retraction fiber and 4) collagen contact-free membrane. White arrow, migration direction. Scale bar, 5 µm. b Zoom of leading pseudopod from ( a ). White arrowheads and insets (A, B), β1 clusters outward-segregated from glycocalyx. Scale bar, 2 µm. c Size of 499 β1 clusters from 22 leading edge protrusions (7 cells, 3 independent experiments). d Representative micrographs (from inset A, panel b) of β1-glycocalyx segregation. White arrowhead and line denote β1 cluster and ROI used for outer cluster analysis. Blue line/arrowhead, lateral ROI/boundaries for β1 cluster-adjacent inner zone. Yellow arrowheads, β1 cluster-associated collagen fibers. Collagen channel, Fire pseudocolor. Asterisk, intersection point of both line ROIs. Scale bar, 1 µm. o, outer cluster; i, inner cluster. e Quantification of β1-glycocalyx distance segregation in individual contact to collagen fibril. Magenta/yellow dashed lines, cluster /glycocalyx enrichment middle, determined by maximum β1/glycocalyx levels for outer clusters and corresponding peak in the lateral ROI (inner zone). Blue box, β1 cluster edges, based on the peak-adjacent lateral minima. f , g paired β1 ( f ) and glycocalyx ( g ) enrichment in outer β1 cluster and corresponding lateral membrane zone, normalized to matched membrane region lacking β1 clustering (“nonfocal”). 25 (cell body) and 38 (inner-outer matched) line ROIs from 9 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test with Bonferroni correction (ε 2 = 0.25 ( f ) and ε 2 = 0.54 ( g ), large effect size). h Segregation distance of β1 and glycocalyx in outer β1 clusters. Data show 25 individual perpendicular membrane regions and 38 focal outward clusters from 11 cells of 3 independent experiments. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (ε 2 = 0.56, large effect size). i Correlation of local glycocalyx density and β1 enrichment in outward β1 clusters (R-squared = −0.02, adjusted p -value = 1). Data replotted from ( h ). Line, logarithmic fitting curve with 95% confidence interval (ribbon). All data derive from the same 3 independent experiments. Cells (all panels): MV3. Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. ROI region of interest. β1, β1 integrin. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: For β1 integrin staining, collagen-embedded cells were incubated in blocking buffer (1 % bovine serum albumin, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# A9647; 10 % normal goat serum, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 10000 C; PBS, 1 h, 20 °C), incubated with a mixture of two mouse anti-human β1 integrin antibodies (clone K20, Novus Biochemicals, NBP2-52708; clone 4B4LDC9LDH8, Beckman Coulter, 6603113; both 10 ug/mL in 50 μl, blocking buffer, 24 h, 4 °C, mild agitation), washed 3 times (blocking buffer, 15 min, 4 °C) and incubated with secondary antibody mouse IgG (H + L) highly cross-adsorbed AlexaFluor647 (2 μg/ml in 50 μl, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A21236, 24 h, 4 °C), 1 μg/mL DAPI (Merck, Cat# D9542), and when non-fluorescent collagen was used, with 2U/ml Phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A12380) (washed again 3x, PBS, 15 min, 4 °C).

    Techniques: Membrane, Migration

    a – f Glycocalyx/β1 fluorescence in leading pseudopod ( a ) and quantification of single ( b ) and multiple ( c , d ) pseudopods normalized by average non-contacting membrane fluorescence. Multichannel and single-channel micrographs from 3-slice maximum-intensity projections from Fig. (region 1) showing glycocalyx along each pseudopod ( d ), vs. β1 enrichment ( e ) or per glycocalyx intensity category ( f ). Line in ( a ), quantification line in ( b ), with colors in ( a ) matching shades in ( b ). Scale bar, 2 µm. Dashed/solid vertical lines, β1 cluster peaks/edges, respectively. Datapoints ( c – f ): 449 β1 clusters from 22 protrusions, 7 cells. Black lines, linear ( d ) and logarithmic ( e ) fit ± 95% CI (ribbon). Calculation ( e , f ), see Supplementary Fig. . Categorized glycocalyx in 3 content groups based on total cluster number. g – i Glycocalyx/β1 distributions in blebs using 3-slice maximum-intensity projections ( g ; indicated in Figs. a- , post-rotation), fluorescence intensity in single bleb ( h ) and multiple blebs ( i ). Line subsegment colors in ( g ), shaded areas in ( h ). Yellow arrowhead, bleb apex. Pseudocolor: Fire-LUT. Scale bar, 2 µm. i Mean glycocalyx intensity normalized to mean collagen-contact-free membrane region; 32 blebs, 12 cells. j Glycocalyx vs. β1 fluorescence in blebs and paired bleb apexes (lines). Datapoints replotted from ( i ). k – m Glycocalyx/β1 fluorescence micrograph (3-slice maximum-intensity projections) ( k ; from Figs. a– ) and quantification along single ( l ) and multiple retraction fibers compartments corrected for collagen-contact-free fluorescence ( m ) and along relative fiber length ( n ). Line in ( k ), quantification line matching ( l ). In ( l ): Solid/dashed lines, cluster edges/centers, respectively. Datapoints ( m ): 328 clusters from 13 retraction fibers, 5 cells. Data in ( d , n ): clusters (dots) on the same protrusion (connected lines distinguished by colors). Line, linear fit ± 95% CI. R values, adjusted coefficient of determination. P.adj, adjusted p-value (all panels). All panels: Kruskall-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction (ε = 0.06 ( f ), indicates moderate effect size; ε = 0.39 ( c ), ε = 0.19 ( i ) and ε = 0.39 ( m ) indicate high effect sizes). β1, β1 integrin. Data present the same 3 independent experiments as Fig. . Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. CI confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Glycocalyx micro- and nanodomains in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions revealed by enhanced click chemistry

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69242-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a – f Glycocalyx/β1 fluorescence in leading pseudopod ( a ) and quantification of single ( b ) and multiple ( c , d ) pseudopods normalized by average non-contacting membrane fluorescence. Multichannel and single-channel micrographs from 3-slice maximum-intensity projections from Fig. (region 1) showing glycocalyx along each pseudopod ( d ), vs. β1 enrichment ( e ) or per glycocalyx intensity category ( f ). Line in ( a ), quantification line in ( b ), with colors in ( a ) matching shades in ( b ). Scale bar, 2 µm. Dashed/solid vertical lines, β1 cluster peaks/edges, respectively. Datapoints ( c – f ): 449 β1 clusters from 22 protrusions, 7 cells. Black lines, linear ( d ) and logarithmic ( e ) fit ± 95% CI (ribbon). Calculation ( e , f ), see Supplementary Fig. . Categorized glycocalyx in 3 content groups based on total cluster number. g – i Glycocalyx/β1 distributions in blebs using 3-slice maximum-intensity projections ( g ; indicated in Figs. a- , post-rotation), fluorescence intensity in single bleb ( h ) and multiple blebs ( i ). Line subsegment colors in ( g ), shaded areas in ( h ). Yellow arrowhead, bleb apex. Pseudocolor: Fire-LUT. Scale bar, 2 µm. i Mean glycocalyx intensity normalized to mean collagen-contact-free membrane region; 32 blebs, 12 cells. j Glycocalyx vs. β1 fluorescence in blebs and paired bleb apexes (lines). Datapoints replotted from ( i ). k – m Glycocalyx/β1 fluorescence micrograph (3-slice maximum-intensity projections) ( k ; from Figs. a– ) and quantification along single ( l ) and multiple retraction fibers compartments corrected for collagen-contact-free fluorescence ( m ) and along relative fiber length ( n ). Line in ( k ), quantification line matching ( l ). In ( l ): Solid/dashed lines, cluster edges/centers, respectively. Datapoints ( m ): 328 clusters from 13 retraction fibers, 5 cells. Data in ( d , n ): clusters (dots) on the same protrusion (connected lines distinguished by colors). Line, linear fit ± 95% CI. R values, adjusted coefficient of determination. P.adj, adjusted p-value (all panels). All panels: Kruskall-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction (ε = 0.06 ( f ), indicates moderate effect size; ε = 0.39 ( c ), ε = 0.19 ( i ) and ε = 0.39 ( m ) indicate high effect sizes). β1, β1 integrin. Data present the same 3 independent experiments as Fig. . Boxplots: middle-line, median; outlines, 1 st -3 rd quantiles; whiskers, quantiles ±1.5x interquantile range. CI confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: For β1 integrin staining, collagen-embedded cells were incubated in blocking buffer (1 % bovine serum albumin, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# A9647; 10 % normal goat serum, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 10000 C; PBS, 1 h, 20 °C), incubated with a mixture of two mouse anti-human β1 integrin antibodies (clone K20, Novus Biochemicals, NBP2-52708; clone 4B4LDC9LDH8, Beckman Coulter, 6603113; both 10 ug/mL in 50 μl, blocking buffer, 24 h, 4 °C, mild agitation), washed 3 times (blocking buffer, 15 min, 4 °C) and incubated with secondary antibody mouse IgG (H + L) highly cross-adsorbed AlexaFluor647 (2 μg/ml in 50 μl, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A21236, 24 h, 4 °C), 1 μg/mL DAPI (Merck, Cat# D9542), and when non-fluorescent collagen was used, with 2U/ml Phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A12380) (washed again 3x, PBS, 15 min, 4 °C).

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Membrane

    a Nanoscale segregation of glycocalyx from β1 integrin cluster in a perpendicular direction. The two-compartment zone consists of an outer β1 integrin cluster with low glycocalyx content, segregating perpendicularly from a glycocalyx-rich region at the cell body with variable β1 integrin enrichment, yet a lack of glycocalyx segregation at the base of this interaction. The outer β1 integrin outer cluster interacts with fibrillar collagen and is connected to the actin cytoskeleton, consistent with a glycocalyx-deficient nanoprotrusion. b I) Micron-scale glycocalyx depletion across a leading edge protrusion from the base towards the apical direction. Dashed rectangle, inset II), which illustrates that glycocalyx-depleted zones of the tip of the leading edge protrusion form a zone of high-integrin clustering sensitivity. c Micron-scale glycocalyx depletion in blebs towards the bleb apex. d Micron-scale glycocalyx depletion towards the tip of retraction fibers. e Micron-scale glycocalyx underrepresentation in cell-cell contacts and gradient-like redistribution out of cell-cell contact along single-cell membrane segments and interconnecting transition zone. In all panels, solid arrows indicate migration direction, and dashed arrows indicate glycocalyx depletion direction.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Glycocalyx micro- and nanodomains in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions revealed by enhanced click chemistry

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69242-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Nanoscale segregation of glycocalyx from β1 integrin cluster in a perpendicular direction. The two-compartment zone consists of an outer β1 integrin cluster with low glycocalyx content, segregating perpendicularly from a glycocalyx-rich region at the cell body with variable β1 integrin enrichment, yet a lack of glycocalyx segregation at the base of this interaction. The outer β1 integrin outer cluster interacts with fibrillar collagen and is connected to the actin cytoskeleton, consistent with a glycocalyx-deficient nanoprotrusion. b I) Micron-scale glycocalyx depletion across a leading edge protrusion from the base towards the apical direction. Dashed rectangle, inset II), which illustrates that glycocalyx-depleted zones of the tip of the leading edge protrusion form a zone of high-integrin clustering sensitivity. c Micron-scale glycocalyx depletion in blebs towards the bleb apex. d Micron-scale glycocalyx depletion towards the tip of retraction fibers. e Micron-scale glycocalyx underrepresentation in cell-cell contacts and gradient-like redistribution out of cell-cell contact along single-cell membrane segments and interconnecting transition zone. In all panels, solid arrows indicate migration direction, and dashed arrows indicate glycocalyx depletion direction.

    Article Snippet: For β1 integrin staining, collagen-embedded cells were incubated in blocking buffer (1 % bovine serum albumin, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# A9647; 10 % normal goat serum, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 10000 C; PBS, 1 h, 20 °C), incubated with a mixture of two mouse anti-human β1 integrin antibodies (clone K20, Novus Biochemicals, NBP2-52708; clone 4B4LDC9LDH8, Beckman Coulter, 6603113; both 10 ug/mL in 50 μl, blocking buffer, 24 h, 4 °C, mild agitation), washed 3 times (blocking buffer, 15 min, 4 °C) and incubated with secondary antibody mouse IgG (H + L) highly cross-adsorbed AlexaFluor647 (2 μg/ml in 50 μl, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A21236, 24 h, 4 °C), 1 μg/mL DAPI (Merck, Cat# D9542), and when non-fluorescent collagen was used, with 2U/ml Phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A12380) (washed again 3x, PBS, 15 min, 4 °C).

    Techniques: Single Cell, Membrane, Migration

    Melanoma cell-intrinsic ITGB2 expression and activation by CD44 ( A ) Single-cell (sc) RNA-seq analysis of human ITGB2 gene ( ITGB2 ) expression by patient melanoma (MM) cells versus tumor-infiltrating T cells or endothelial cells (ECs), as depicted by violin plots (median, bold white line; top and bottom quartiles, thin white lines) overlayed with dots representing respective single cells ( B ) Percentages (mean,) of human ITGB2 surface protein expression by patient MM cells, T cells, and ECs ( n = 5 patients) as determined by flow cytometry ( C ) Mean ITGB2 + SOX10 + frequency (%) in benign nevi ( n = 7 patients), primary melanomas ( n = 24 patients), and metastatic melanomas ( n = 13 patients) as determined by multicolor immunofluorescence staining of a patient melanocytic tissue microarray (TMA). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used to assess statistical significance ( D ) Incidence (%) of patient sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases versus respective primary melanoma biospecimen cohorts ( n = 105) of increasing cancer cell-ITGB2 positivity, 0–2% ( n = 40), 2–25% ( n = 36), >25% ( n = 29), as determined by immunostaining. Frequencies of ITGB2-positive (black bars) and ITGB2-negative (white bars) melanoma cells within each cohort are shown. Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine statistical significance ( E ) Representative multiplex immunofluorescence staining of a patient primary melanoma biopsy for co-expression of ITGB2 (red, all panels) and the melanocytic marker, nuclear SOX-10 (green, first panel), pan T cell marker, CD3 (green, second panel), vascular endothelial marker, CD31 (green, third panel), or macrophage marker, PU.1 (green, fourth panel). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Size bars, 50 μm ( F and G ), Representative immunoblots of ITGB2 protein expression by (F) human melanoma lines, A2058, A375, C8161, FEMX, LOX-IMVI, MDA-MB-435S, and control HSB-2 T lymphoblastic leukemia cells and HUVEC endothelial cells, and (G) murine melanoma lines, B16-F10, YUMM1.7, YUMM3.3, YUMM4.1, YUMM5.2, and control EL-4 T cell lymphoma cells and C166 endothelial cells ( H and I ) Effect of CD44 ab-mediated crosslinking (black bars) versus isotype control ab treatment (white bars) on ITGB2 surface protein expression level (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI, ± SEM) by (H) human and (I) murine melanoma lines and respective cell controls (gray bars) as above, based on FC analysis ( J and K ) Effect of CD44 ab crosslinking as in (H and I) on the activation state of human melanoma cell-ITGB2 as determined by FC (MFI ± SEM) using the activation-sensitive ITGB2 antibody clones (J) KIM-127 and (K) MEM-148. Results are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; NS, not significant. See also figs. S1, S2, and S3.

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: Targeting the tumor cell-intrinsic ITGB2 axis inhibits melanoma progression

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02527-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Melanoma cell-intrinsic ITGB2 expression and activation by CD44 ( A ) Single-cell (sc) RNA-seq analysis of human ITGB2 gene ( ITGB2 ) expression by patient melanoma (MM) cells versus tumor-infiltrating T cells or endothelial cells (ECs), as depicted by violin plots (median, bold white line; top and bottom quartiles, thin white lines) overlayed with dots representing respective single cells ( B ) Percentages (mean,) of human ITGB2 surface protein expression by patient MM cells, T cells, and ECs ( n = 5 patients) as determined by flow cytometry ( C ) Mean ITGB2 + SOX10 + frequency (%) in benign nevi ( n = 7 patients), primary melanomas ( n = 24 patients), and metastatic melanomas ( n = 13 patients) as determined by multicolor immunofluorescence staining of a patient melanocytic tissue microarray (TMA). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used to assess statistical significance ( D ) Incidence (%) of patient sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases versus respective primary melanoma biospecimen cohorts ( n = 105) of increasing cancer cell-ITGB2 positivity, 0–2% ( n = 40), 2–25% ( n = 36), >25% ( n = 29), as determined by immunostaining. Frequencies of ITGB2-positive (black bars) and ITGB2-negative (white bars) melanoma cells within each cohort are shown. Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine statistical significance ( E ) Representative multiplex immunofluorescence staining of a patient primary melanoma biopsy for co-expression of ITGB2 (red, all panels) and the melanocytic marker, nuclear SOX-10 (green, first panel), pan T cell marker, CD3 (green, second panel), vascular endothelial marker, CD31 (green, third panel), or macrophage marker, PU.1 (green, fourth panel). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Size bars, 50 μm ( F and G ), Representative immunoblots of ITGB2 protein expression by (F) human melanoma lines, A2058, A375, C8161, FEMX, LOX-IMVI, MDA-MB-435S, and control HSB-2 T lymphoblastic leukemia cells and HUVEC endothelial cells, and (G) murine melanoma lines, B16-F10, YUMM1.7, YUMM3.3, YUMM4.1, YUMM5.2, and control EL-4 T cell lymphoma cells and C166 endothelial cells ( H and I ) Effect of CD44 ab-mediated crosslinking (black bars) versus isotype control ab treatment (white bars) on ITGB2 surface protein expression level (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI, ± SEM) by (H) human and (I) murine melanoma lines and respective cell controls (gray bars) as above, based on FC analysis ( J and K ) Effect of CD44 ab crosslinking as in (H and I) on the activation state of human melanoma cell-ITGB2 as determined by FC (MFI ± SEM) using the activation-sensitive ITGB2 antibody clones (J) KIM-127 and (K) MEM-148. Results are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; NS, not significant. See also figs. S1, S2, and S3.

    Article Snippet: The following abs and reagents were used for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence: unconjugated mouse anti-human ITGB2 ab (clone MEM-48, Novus Biologicals, Cat# NB500-379, RRID: AB_10000712), Dako REAL Detection System, Alkaline Phosphatase/RED (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, Cat# K5005), Biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31800, RRID: AB_228305), AF546-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21123, RRID: AB_2535765), and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21121, RRID: AB_2535764), unconjugated rabbit anti-human SOX10 (clone EPR4007, Abcam, Cat# ab155279, RRID: AB_2650603), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD3 (clone SP162, Abcam, Cat# ab135372, RRID: AB_2884903), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD31 (clone EPR3094, Abcam, Cat# ab76533, RRID: AB_1523298), unconjugated rabbit anti-human ICAM-1 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# SAB5700809, RRID: AB_3669069) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A10520, RRID: AB_10563288) or AF488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165), unconjugated mouse anti-human SOX10 (clone 1D2C8, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, Cat#66786-1-Ig, RRID: AB_2882131) and AF647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21241, RRID: AB_2535810), unconjugated mouse anti-human PU.1 (clone G148-74, BD Biosciences, Cat# 554268, RRID: AB_395335) and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21131, RRID: AB_2535771).

    Techniques: Expressing, Activation Assay, RNA Sequencing, Flow Cytometry, Multicolor Immunofluorescence Staining, Microarray, Immunostaining, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Marker, Western Blot, Control, Fluorescence, Clone Assay

    Antibody-based blockade of melanoma cell-intrinsic ITGB2 inhibits ICAM-1-dependent adhesion and growth ( A and B ) Relative in vitro adhesion (mean ± SEM) to immobilized ICAM-1 versus negative coating control of (A) human melanoma C8161 and MDA-MB-435S or positive control HSB-2 cells and (B) murine melanoma B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 or positive control EL-4 cells, either untreated (respective left panels) or treated with ITGB2 blocking ab or EDTA pan-integrin antagonist versus isotype control ab (respective right panels). ( C and D ) Tumor growth kinetics in vivo (mean ± SEM) of (C) human C8161 and MDA-MB-435S cells in NSG mice treated with human-specific ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab or (D) murine B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells in NSG mice treated with anti-murine ITGB2 blocking versus isotype control ab. Results in panels (A and B) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 3 independent experiments. The unpaired Student’s t test was used to statistically compare two groups and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test for comparison of three groups. Panels (C and D) involved n = 5–20 mice per respective treatment group. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed model followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons correction were used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. See also Figs. and , and , fig. S3

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: Targeting the tumor cell-intrinsic ITGB2 axis inhibits melanoma progression

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02527-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antibody-based blockade of melanoma cell-intrinsic ITGB2 inhibits ICAM-1-dependent adhesion and growth ( A and B ) Relative in vitro adhesion (mean ± SEM) to immobilized ICAM-1 versus negative coating control of (A) human melanoma C8161 and MDA-MB-435S or positive control HSB-2 cells and (B) murine melanoma B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 or positive control EL-4 cells, either untreated (respective left panels) or treated with ITGB2 blocking ab or EDTA pan-integrin antagonist versus isotype control ab (respective right panels). ( C and D ) Tumor growth kinetics in vivo (mean ± SEM) of (C) human C8161 and MDA-MB-435S cells in NSG mice treated with human-specific ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab or (D) murine B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells in NSG mice treated with anti-murine ITGB2 blocking versus isotype control ab. Results in panels (A and B) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 3 independent experiments. The unpaired Student’s t test was used to statistically compare two groups and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test for comparison of three groups. Panels (C and D) involved n = 5–20 mice per respective treatment group. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed model followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons correction were used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. See also Figs. and , and , fig. S3

    Article Snippet: The following abs and reagents were used for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence: unconjugated mouse anti-human ITGB2 ab (clone MEM-48, Novus Biologicals, Cat# NB500-379, RRID: AB_10000712), Dako REAL Detection System, Alkaline Phosphatase/RED (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, Cat# K5005), Biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31800, RRID: AB_228305), AF546-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21123, RRID: AB_2535765), and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21121, RRID: AB_2535764), unconjugated rabbit anti-human SOX10 (clone EPR4007, Abcam, Cat# ab155279, RRID: AB_2650603), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD3 (clone SP162, Abcam, Cat# ab135372, RRID: AB_2884903), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD31 (clone EPR3094, Abcam, Cat# ab76533, RRID: AB_1523298), unconjugated rabbit anti-human ICAM-1 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# SAB5700809, RRID: AB_3669069) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A10520, RRID: AB_10563288) or AF488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165), unconjugated mouse anti-human SOX10 (clone 1D2C8, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, Cat#66786-1-Ig, RRID: AB_2882131) and AF647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21241, RRID: AB_2535810), unconjugated mouse anti-human PU.1 (clone G148-74, BD Biosciences, Cat# 554268, RRID: AB_395335) and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21131, RRID: AB_2535771).

    Techniques: In Vitro, Control, Positive Control, Blocking Assay, In Vivo, Comparison

    Antibody-based ITGB2 blockade or host Icam1 deficiency inhibit melanoma metastasis ( A to C ) Effect of anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab on tumorigenesis of B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells in wildtype (WT) C57BL/6 mice. (A) Tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM), (B) relative intratumoral T cell levels, and (C) relative lung metastasis of GFP-expressing melanoma cells were determined by qPCR-based quantitation of genomic Cd3 or GFP in tumor and lung tissue, respectively. (B ) Primer specificity for Cd3 was validated using positive control murine T cells and negative control B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells. (C) Specificity of GFP primers was authenticated using positive control GFP-expressing B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells and negative control lungs obtained from WT mice without tumors. ( D to F ) Effect of anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab on tumorigenesis of B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells in Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice. (D) Tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM), (E) intratumoral T cell levels, and (F) lung metastasis in Icam1- deficient mice were determined by qPCR analysis using positive and negative cell and sample controls, as above. Panels (A and D) involved n = 16–20 mice per respective treatment group. Results in panels (B, C, E, and F) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 3 independent experiments. Tumor control groups in panels B and E, C and F are identical, respectively. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed model followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons correction were used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth in panels (A and D). Data in (B, C, E, and F) were statistically compared using the unpaired Student’s t test. *, p < 0.05; NS, not significant; nd, not detected. See also Figs. and , fig. S3

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: Targeting the tumor cell-intrinsic ITGB2 axis inhibits melanoma progression

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02527-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antibody-based ITGB2 blockade or host Icam1 deficiency inhibit melanoma metastasis ( A to C ) Effect of anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab on tumorigenesis of B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells in wildtype (WT) C57BL/6 mice. (A) Tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM), (B) relative intratumoral T cell levels, and (C) relative lung metastasis of GFP-expressing melanoma cells were determined by qPCR-based quantitation of genomic Cd3 or GFP in tumor and lung tissue, respectively. (B ) Primer specificity for Cd3 was validated using positive control murine T cells and negative control B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells. (C) Specificity of GFP primers was authenticated using positive control GFP-expressing B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells and negative control lungs obtained from WT mice without tumors. ( D to F ) Effect of anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab on tumorigenesis of B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 cells in Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice. (D) Tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM), (E) intratumoral T cell levels, and (F) lung metastasis in Icam1- deficient mice were determined by qPCR analysis using positive and negative cell and sample controls, as above. Panels (A and D) involved n = 16–20 mice per respective treatment group. Results in panels (B, C, E, and F) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 3 independent experiments. Tumor control groups in panels B and E, C and F are identical, respectively. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed model followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons correction were used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth in panels (A and D). Data in (B, C, E, and F) were statistically compared using the unpaired Student’s t test. *, p < 0.05; NS, not significant; nd, not detected. See also Figs. and , fig. S3

    Article Snippet: The following abs and reagents were used for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence: unconjugated mouse anti-human ITGB2 ab (clone MEM-48, Novus Biologicals, Cat# NB500-379, RRID: AB_10000712), Dako REAL Detection System, Alkaline Phosphatase/RED (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, Cat# K5005), Biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31800, RRID: AB_228305), AF546-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21123, RRID: AB_2535765), and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21121, RRID: AB_2535764), unconjugated rabbit anti-human SOX10 (clone EPR4007, Abcam, Cat# ab155279, RRID: AB_2650603), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD3 (clone SP162, Abcam, Cat# ab135372, RRID: AB_2884903), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD31 (clone EPR3094, Abcam, Cat# ab76533, RRID: AB_1523298), unconjugated rabbit anti-human ICAM-1 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# SAB5700809, RRID: AB_3669069) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A10520, RRID: AB_10563288) or AF488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165), unconjugated mouse anti-human SOX10 (clone 1D2C8, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, Cat#66786-1-Ig, RRID: AB_2882131) and AF647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21241, RRID: AB_2535810), unconjugated mouse anti-human PU.1 (clone G148-74, BD Biosciences, Cat# 554268, RRID: AB_395335) and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21131, RRID: AB_2535771).

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Control, Expressing, Quantitation Assay, Positive Control, Negative Control

    CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic knockout of melanoma cell-intrinsic Itgb2 suppresses adhesion to ICAM-1 and resultant tumor growth ( A ) Validation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated stable KO of Itgb2 gene and ITGB2 protein in B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 melanoma cells as determined by RT-qPCR (left panel) and immunoblotting (right panel). ( B to F ) Itgb2 KO versus respective Cas9 control B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 tumor cell relative (B) in vitro adhesion (mean ± SEM) to immobilized ICAM-1, with or without negative control EDTA treatment, (C) in vitro growth (mean ± SEM) as determined by CellTiter-Glo-based luminescence analysis, and (D to F) in vivo tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM) in (D) NSG mice, (E) C57BL/6 mice, and (F) Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice. ( G ) Relative Icam1 gene expression in B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 tumors from C57BL/6 mice (black bars) versus Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice (white bars), with positive control murine T cells and C166 endothelial cells shown (gray bars). ( H ) scRNA-seq analysis of human ICAM1 gene expression in patient melanoma (MM) cells, tumor-infiltrating T cells, and endothelial cells (ECs) as depicted by violin plots (median, bold white line; top and bottom quartiles, thin white lines) overlayed with dots representing respective single cells. ( I ) Percentages (mean) of human ICAM-1 surface protein expression by patient MM cells, T cells, and ECs ( n = 5 patients) as determined by FC. ( J ) Multiplex immunofluorescence staining of a representative ( n = 4 patients) clinical melanoma biospecimen for expression of the melanocytic marker, nuclear SOX-10 (red, first panel), ITGB2 (yellow, second panel), and ICAM-1 (green, third panel). The merged image is also shown (fourth panel). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Size bars, 50 μm. Results in panels (A, B, C, and G) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 3 independent experiments. The unpaired Student’s t test was used to statistically compare two groups and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test for comparison of three groups. Panels (D to F) involved n = 10 mice per respective melanoma cell variant. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, not significant; nd, not detected. See also Figs. and 4, figs. S3 and S4

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: Targeting the tumor cell-intrinsic ITGB2 axis inhibits melanoma progression

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02527-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic knockout of melanoma cell-intrinsic Itgb2 suppresses adhesion to ICAM-1 and resultant tumor growth ( A ) Validation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated stable KO of Itgb2 gene and ITGB2 protein in B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 melanoma cells as determined by RT-qPCR (left panel) and immunoblotting (right panel). ( B to F ) Itgb2 KO versus respective Cas9 control B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 tumor cell relative (B) in vitro adhesion (mean ± SEM) to immobilized ICAM-1, with or without negative control EDTA treatment, (C) in vitro growth (mean ± SEM) as determined by CellTiter-Glo-based luminescence analysis, and (D to F) in vivo tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM) in (D) NSG mice, (E) C57BL/6 mice, and (F) Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice. ( G ) Relative Icam1 gene expression in B16-F10 and YUMM5.2 tumors from C57BL/6 mice (black bars) versus Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice (white bars), with positive control murine T cells and C166 endothelial cells shown (gray bars). ( H ) scRNA-seq analysis of human ICAM1 gene expression in patient melanoma (MM) cells, tumor-infiltrating T cells, and endothelial cells (ECs) as depicted by violin plots (median, bold white line; top and bottom quartiles, thin white lines) overlayed with dots representing respective single cells. ( I ) Percentages (mean) of human ICAM-1 surface protein expression by patient MM cells, T cells, and ECs ( n = 5 patients) as determined by FC. ( J ) Multiplex immunofluorescence staining of a representative ( n = 4 patients) clinical melanoma biospecimen for expression of the melanocytic marker, nuclear SOX-10 (red, first panel), ITGB2 (yellow, second panel), and ICAM-1 (green, third panel). The merged image is also shown (fourth panel). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Size bars, 50 μm. Results in panels (A, B, C, and G) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 3 independent experiments. The unpaired Student’s t test was used to statistically compare two groups and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test for comparison of three groups. Panels (D to F) involved n = 10 mice per respective melanoma cell variant. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, not significant; nd, not detected. See also Figs. and 4, figs. S3 and S4

    Article Snippet: The following abs and reagents were used for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence: unconjugated mouse anti-human ITGB2 ab (clone MEM-48, Novus Biologicals, Cat# NB500-379, RRID: AB_10000712), Dako REAL Detection System, Alkaline Phosphatase/RED (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, Cat# K5005), Biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31800, RRID: AB_228305), AF546-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21123, RRID: AB_2535765), and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21121, RRID: AB_2535764), unconjugated rabbit anti-human SOX10 (clone EPR4007, Abcam, Cat# ab155279, RRID: AB_2650603), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD3 (clone SP162, Abcam, Cat# ab135372, RRID: AB_2884903), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD31 (clone EPR3094, Abcam, Cat# ab76533, RRID: AB_1523298), unconjugated rabbit anti-human ICAM-1 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# SAB5700809, RRID: AB_3669069) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A10520, RRID: AB_10563288) or AF488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165), unconjugated mouse anti-human SOX10 (clone 1D2C8, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, Cat#66786-1-Ig, RRID: AB_2882131) and AF647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21241, RRID: AB_2535810), unconjugated mouse anti-human PU.1 (clone G148-74, BD Biosciences, Cat# 554268, RRID: AB_395335) and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21131, RRID: AB_2535771).

    Techniques: CRISPR, Knock-Out, Biomarker Discovery, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Control, In Vitro, Negative Control, In Vivo, Gene Expression, Positive Control, Expressing, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Marker, Comparison, Variant Assay

    The melanoma cell-ITGB2:ICAM-1 axis stimulates downstream Wnt pathway activation, the inhibition of which suppresses cancer cell:ICAM-1 adhesion ( A ) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) exhibiting pathway interconnectivity ( n = 51) in Itgb2 KO versus control YUMM5.2 tumors and which showed consistent trends in both NSG (left panel) and wildtype (WT) C57BL/6 mice (middle panel), but not in Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 hosts (right panel), as determined by RNA-seq analysis. ( B ) Protein-protein interaction and cluster map (STRING) of 22 of the 51 DEGs described in (A) exhibiting the strongest interaction scores. Respective network clusters (gray ovals) and relative strengths of direct protein-protein interactions (stronger, wider lines; weaker, thinner lines) as well as indirect associations (dashed lines) are shown. Proteins without any designated cluster associations were omitted. The paired Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistical significance. ( C ) Magnitude of difference in expression of each Wnt pathway DEG in Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control melanomas (log fold change) as in (A) and identified in the Gene Ontology Biological Process (GOBP) database. Wnt signaling effectors were grouped into activating ( Frat2 , Kpna1 , Wnt5a , Wnt5b ) versus inhibitory ( Dkk2 , Igfbp4 , Kank1 , Notum ) cohorts. Medians are represented by horizontal bars in box and whiskers plots. ( D ) Validation by RT-qPCR (fold change) of Wnt effector DEGs as in (C) using independent Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 tumor biospecimens from NSG, WT, or Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice. Medians are represented by horizontal bars in box and whiskers plots. ( E ) Representative immunoblots of canonical Wnt mediators, active (non-p) β-catenin and LEF-1, and ACTB loading control (left), and non-canonical Wnt effector, p-VANGL2, and respective total controls (right) in Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 melanoma cells. ( F ) Representatie immunoblots of Wnt signaling mediators as in (E) of YUMM5.2 melanoma cells treated with the Wnt inhibitors, pyrvinium pamoate, LGK974, or zamaporvint, versus vehicle control. ( G and H ) Relative in vitro adhesion (mean ± SEM) to immobilized ICAM-1 as determined by CellTiter-Glo-based luminescence analysis of (G) Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 variants and (H) anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab treated YUMM5.2 wildtype cells, in the combined presence or absence of pyrvinium pamoate, LGK974, zamaporvint, or vehicle control. The paired Student’s t test was used to assess statistical significance. Panels (A, B, C, and D) are representative of n = 2–6 tumors per variant group in each respective animal host. Results in (E, F, G, and H) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 2–7 independent experiments each. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also Figs. and , and , figs. S5 and S6

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: Targeting the tumor cell-intrinsic ITGB2 axis inhibits melanoma progression

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02527-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The melanoma cell-ITGB2:ICAM-1 axis stimulates downstream Wnt pathway activation, the inhibition of which suppresses cancer cell:ICAM-1 adhesion ( A ) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) exhibiting pathway interconnectivity ( n = 51) in Itgb2 KO versus control YUMM5.2 tumors and which showed consistent trends in both NSG (left panel) and wildtype (WT) C57BL/6 mice (middle panel), but not in Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 hosts (right panel), as determined by RNA-seq analysis. ( B ) Protein-protein interaction and cluster map (STRING) of 22 of the 51 DEGs described in (A) exhibiting the strongest interaction scores. Respective network clusters (gray ovals) and relative strengths of direct protein-protein interactions (stronger, wider lines; weaker, thinner lines) as well as indirect associations (dashed lines) are shown. Proteins without any designated cluster associations were omitted. The paired Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistical significance. ( C ) Magnitude of difference in expression of each Wnt pathway DEG in Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control melanomas (log fold change) as in (A) and identified in the Gene Ontology Biological Process (GOBP) database. Wnt signaling effectors were grouped into activating ( Frat2 , Kpna1 , Wnt5a , Wnt5b ) versus inhibitory ( Dkk2 , Igfbp4 , Kank1 , Notum ) cohorts. Medians are represented by horizontal bars in box and whiskers plots. ( D ) Validation by RT-qPCR (fold change) of Wnt effector DEGs as in (C) using independent Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 tumor biospecimens from NSG, WT, or Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice. Medians are represented by horizontal bars in box and whiskers plots. ( E ) Representative immunoblots of canonical Wnt mediators, active (non-p) β-catenin and LEF-1, and ACTB loading control (left), and non-canonical Wnt effector, p-VANGL2, and respective total controls (right) in Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 melanoma cells. ( F ) Representatie immunoblots of Wnt signaling mediators as in (E) of YUMM5.2 melanoma cells treated with the Wnt inhibitors, pyrvinium pamoate, LGK974, or zamaporvint, versus vehicle control. ( G and H ) Relative in vitro adhesion (mean ± SEM) to immobilized ICAM-1 as determined by CellTiter-Glo-based luminescence analysis of (G) Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 variants and (H) anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab treated YUMM5.2 wildtype cells, in the combined presence or absence of pyrvinium pamoate, LGK974, zamaporvint, or vehicle control. The paired Student’s t test was used to assess statistical significance. Panels (A, B, C, and D) are representative of n = 2–6 tumors per variant group in each respective animal host. Results in (E, F, G, and H) are representative of and/or pooled from at least n = 2–7 independent experiments each. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also Figs. and , and , figs. S5 and S6

    Article Snippet: The following abs and reagents were used for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence: unconjugated mouse anti-human ITGB2 ab (clone MEM-48, Novus Biologicals, Cat# NB500-379, RRID: AB_10000712), Dako REAL Detection System, Alkaline Phosphatase/RED (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, Cat# K5005), Biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31800, RRID: AB_228305), AF546-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21123, RRID: AB_2535765), and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21121, RRID: AB_2535764), unconjugated rabbit anti-human SOX10 (clone EPR4007, Abcam, Cat# ab155279, RRID: AB_2650603), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD3 (clone SP162, Abcam, Cat# ab135372, RRID: AB_2884903), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD31 (clone EPR3094, Abcam, Cat# ab76533, RRID: AB_1523298), unconjugated rabbit anti-human ICAM-1 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# SAB5700809, RRID: AB_3669069) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A10520, RRID: AB_10563288) or AF488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165), unconjugated mouse anti-human SOX10 (clone 1D2C8, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, Cat#66786-1-Ig, RRID: AB_2882131) and AF647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21241, RRID: AB_2535810), unconjugated mouse anti-human PU.1 (clone G148-74, BD Biosciences, Cat# 554268, RRID: AB_395335) and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21131, RRID: AB_2535771).

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Inhibition, Control, RNA Sequencing, Protein-Protein interactions, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, In Vitro, Blocking Assay, Variant Assay

    Wnt antagonism suppresses ITGB2:ICAM-1-dependent melanoma growth in vivo ( A and B ) Tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM) of (A) Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 variant cells or (B) YUMM5.2 wildtype cells treated with anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab, with or without concurrent administration of the Wnt inhibitors, pyrvinium pamoate, LGK974, zamaporvint, as well as vehicle control in NSG (left panel), wildtype (WT) C57BL/6 (middle panel), or Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice (right panel). Because tumorigenicity experiments evaluating LGK974 and zamaporvint effects were conducted concurrently, vehicle control groups for both drugs are identical. Panels (A and B) involved n = 6–10 mice per respective treatment group. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed model followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons correction were used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth in panels. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also Fig.

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: Targeting the tumor cell-intrinsic ITGB2 axis inhibits melanoma progression

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02527-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Wnt antagonism suppresses ITGB2:ICAM-1-dependent melanoma growth in vivo ( A and B ) Tumor growth kinetics (mean ± SEM) of (A) Itgb2 KO versus Cas9 control YUMM5.2 variant cells or (B) YUMM5.2 wildtype cells treated with anti-murine ITGB2 blocking ab versus isotype control ab, with or without concurrent administration of the Wnt inhibitors, pyrvinium pamoate, LGK974, zamaporvint, as well as vehicle control in NSG (left panel), wildtype (WT) C57BL/6 (middle panel), or Icam1 −/− C57BL/6 mice (right panel). Because tumorigenicity experiments evaluating LGK974 and zamaporvint effects were conducted concurrently, vehicle control groups for both drugs are identical. Panels (A and B) involved n = 6–10 mice per respective treatment group. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed model followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons correction were used to assess statistical differences in tumor growth in panels. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; NS, not significant. See also Fig.

    Article Snippet: The following abs and reagents were used for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence: unconjugated mouse anti-human ITGB2 ab (clone MEM-48, Novus Biologicals, Cat# NB500-379, RRID: AB_10000712), Dako REAL Detection System, Alkaline Phosphatase/RED (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, Cat# K5005), Biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31800, RRID: AB_228305), AF546-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21123, RRID: AB_2535765), and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21121, RRID: AB_2535764), unconjugated rabbit anti-human SOX10 (clone EPR4007, Abcam, Cat# ab155279, RRID: AB_2650603), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD3 (clone SP162, Abcam, Cat# ab135372, RRID: AB_2884903), unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD31 (clone EPR3094, Abcam, Cat# ab76533, RRID: AB_1523298), unconjugated rabbit anti-human ICAM-1 (MilliporeSigma, Cat# SAB5700809, RRID: AB_3669069) and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A10520, RRID: AB_10563288) or AF488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165), unconjugated mouse anti-human SOX10 (clone 1D2C8, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, Cat#66786-1-Ig, RRID: AB_2882131) and AF647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21241, RRID: AB_2535810), unconjugated mouse anti-human PU.1 (clone G148-74, BD Biosciences, Cat# 554268, RRID: AB_395335) and AF488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21131, RRID: AB_2535771).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Control, Variant Assay, Blocking Assay